Carbon Footprint of Spotify
IdleForest models one hour of Spotify use at about 2g of CO2.
Audio streaming on Spotify is significantly more energy-efficient than video, but millions of simultaneous streams still create a noticeable carbon footprint.
Start with the calculator
Calculate Your Footprint
What drives this estimate most
- Device choice can be as important as the platform itself, especially when a TV or console is involved.
- Higher resolutions typically increase both data transfer and local playback energy.
- Long sessions compound quickly because streaming is continuous rather than bursty.
Assumptions and boundaries
- The estimate represents a typical hour of use and folds together platform, network, and device overhead.
- It is designed for comparison between services rather than for a lab-grade device test.
- Actual impact changes with video quality, autoplay behavior, and playback hardware.
Uncertainty note: Streaming estimates vary with bitrate, codec efficiency, playback device, and local electricity mix, so the right interpretation is comparative rather than absolute.
Yearly Impact Comparison
*IdleForest offsets ~200kg CO2/year on average per user.
Ways to reduce this footprint
- Stream at the lowest quality that still feels good for the context.
- Prefer smaller devices when you do not need a TV-sized screen.
- Cut autoplay loops on short-form platforms to reduce accidental watch time.
Estimate review
Who reviewed this estimate
Reviewed by: IdleForest Research Team
Role: Editorial Review
Organization: IdleForest
Last reviewed: April 24, 2026
These estimates are meant to help compare digital habits. They are directional, not exact reproductions of proprietary vendor accounting.
Sources
Carbon Trust: Carbon impact of video streaming (PDF)
Useful benchmark for streaming emissions and the role of the viewing device.
Nature Communications: The environmental sustainability of digital content consumption
Peer-reviewed life-cycle assessment covering web use, social media, video, music streaming, and video conferencing.
More questions about Spotify's carbon footprint
Does Spotify have a high carbon footprint?
Audio streaming is very lean (~2g/hr), but downloaded music is even better as it reduces repeated network data transfer.
Explore related carbon guides
Carbon footprint hub
Browse the main carbon footprint guide and jump to the pages that best match your digital habits.
AI carbon footprint
Learn what drives AI emissions and compare tools like ChatGPT.
Streaming carbon footprint
Compare services like YouTube, Netflix, Twitch, and Spotify.
Digital carbon footprint
See how browsing, meetings, and social apps add to your digital emissions.
Featured carbon guides
ChatGPT
ChatGPT's carbon footprint comes from every request, response, and supporting system behind the model. If you're asking how much CO2 ChatGPT produces, the answer depends on model size, response length, and how often you use it.
Every photo, Reel, and Story on Instagram requires server storage and global network transmission, contributing to your personal digital footprint.
TikTok
TikTok's footprint comes from video delivery, device energy use, and the time people spend scrolling through high-definition short-form video.
About IdleForest
IdleForest is a passive browser extension that plants trees while you browse, game, or stream. It uses your unused internet bandwidth to fund reforestation projects.
✓Free to use
✓No account required
✓Open source