Netflix vs Spotify

This comparison uses the current IdleForest model for Netflix and Spotify: their category, modeled CO2 per use unit, methodology notes, key drivers, and assumptions.

Supporting comparison page

Netflix

Streaming

55g

CO2 / HOUR

Higher emissions

Spotify

Streaming

CO2 / HOUR

Data-backed comparison

Summary

When comparing Netflix and Spotify, Netflix generates significantly more CO2 emissions per hour (55g) than Spotify (2g). Both applications rely on devices, networks, and server infrastructure, which all contribute to their environmental impact.

Why the gap happens

Netflix is modeled at 55g CO2 per unit, while Spotify is modeled at 2g, so the visible gap is 53g in the current dataset.
Both products sit in the Streaming category, so the difference comes from the per-product estimate and page-level methodology fields rather than a category change.
The Netflix estimate is based on one hour of video streaming and reflects both digital infrastructure and the device used to watch the content.
Device choice can be as important as the platform itself, especially when a TV or console is involved.

What to act on first

Because Netflix is higher in the current model, start there: Stream at the lowest quality that still feels good for the context.

Netflix is currently modeled at 53g CO2 more per unit of use than Spotify.

Deep dive into their footprints

Read the full Netflix report Read the full Spotify report

Comparison takeaways

Netflix is modeled at 55g CO2 per unit, while Spotify is modeled at 2g, so the visible gap is 53g in the current dataset.

Both products sit in the Streaming category, so the difference comes from the per-product estimate and page-level methodology fields rather than a category change.

About IdleForest

IdleForest is a desktop app that plants trees in the background while your computer is idle. It uses your unused internet bandwidth to fund reforestation projects.

Connect Desktop App