Netflix vs Twitch

This comparison uses the current IdleForest model for Netflix and Twitch: their category, modeled CO2 per use unit, methodology notes, key drivers, and assumptions.

Supporting comparison page

Netflix

Streaming

55g

CO2 / HOUR

Twitch

Streaming

55g

CO2 / HOUR

Data-backed comparison

Summary

When comparing Netflix and Twitch, they have an identical estimated carbon footprint per hour of usage. Both applications rely on devices, networks, and server infrastructure, which all contribute to their environmental impact.

Why the gap happens

These two products land at the same estimate in the current model, so the better optimization target is whichever one takes more of your time.
Both products sit in the Streaming category, so the difference comes from the per-product estimate and page-level methodology fields rather than a category change.

What to act on first

Start with the higher modeled source if both tools are equally important to you; otherwise, prioritize whichever one takes more of your real usage time.

These two products land at the same estimate in the current model, so the better optimization target is whichever one takes more of your time.

Deep dive into their footprints

Read the full Netflix report Read the full Twitch report

Comparison takeaways

These two products land at the same estimate in the current model, so the better optimization target is whichever one takes more of your time.

Both products sit in the Streaming category, so the difference comes from the per-product estimate and page-level methodology fields rather than a category change.

About IdleForest

IdleForest is a desktop app that plants trees in the background while your computer is idle. It uses your unused internet bandwidth to fund reforestation projects.

Connect Desktop App