Carbon Footprint Comparison

Bitcoin (1 Tx) vs Ethereum (Tx)

This comparison matters because Bitcoin and Ethereum represent very different network energy profiles, especially after Ethereum's move away from proof-of-work.

Bitcoin (1 Tx) Logo

Bitcoin (1 Tx)

Crypto

400000g

CO2 / HOUR

Higher emissions
VS
Ethereum (Tx) Logo

Ethereum (Tx)

Crypto

13g

CO2 / HOUR

Consensus design comparison

Summary

When comparing Bitcoin (1 Tx) and Ethereum (Tx), Bitcoin (1 Tx) generates significantly more CO2 emissions per hour (400000g) than Ethereum (Tx) (13g). Both applications rely on devices, networks, and server infrastructure, which all contribute to their environmental impact.

Why the gap happens

  • Consensus design affects the total network energy requirement.
  • Transaction attribution is still debated, so use the result directionally.
  • This is a systems comparison more than a device-use comparison.

What to act on first

If crypto is part of the footprint you are trying to cut, network choice matters more here than typical browser or app optimizations.

Bitcoin (1 Tx) is currently modeled at 399987g CO2 more per unit of use than Ethereum (Tx).

Comparison takeaways

Consensus design affects the total network energy requirement.
Transaction attribution is still debated, so use the result directionally.

About IdleForest

IdleForest is a desktop app that plants trees in the background while your computer is idle. It uses your unused internet bandwidth to fund reforestation projects.

Connect Desktop App