Discord vs Slack

Discord and Slack look similar on the surface, but the usage pattern is different: Discord often mixes text, voice rooms, streams, and community media, while Slack is usually work messaging with occasional huddles and calls.

Discord

Redes Sociales

35g

CO2 / HORA

Más emisiones

Slack

Trabajo

30g

CO2 / HORA

Community chat versus work chat

Resumen

Al comparar Discord y Slack, Discord genera significativamente más CO2 por hora (35g) que Slack (30g). Ambas aplicaciones dependen de dispositivos, redes e infraestructura de servidores, que contribuyen a su impacto ambiental.

Por qué se produce la diferencia

Discord is modeled higher because long voice rooms, screen sharing, and media-rich communities can raise the active-session footprint.
Slack is modeled as a work chat tool that stays synced across devices but usually spends more time in text, notifications, and file previews than in continuous media.
Both estimates include device, network, and server-side overhead, and both use the same yearly formula: grams per hour x daily hours x 365 / 1000.

En qué actuar primero

For both tools, reduce the high-intensity sessions first: unnecessary screen sharing, long idle voice rooms, and always-on video.

Discord está modelado actualmente con 5g de CO2 más por unidad de uso que Slack.

Analiza sus huellas en detalle

Leer el informe completo de Discord Leer el informe completo de Slack

Conclusiones de la comparación

Discord is modeled higher because long voice rooms, screen sharing, and media-rich communities can raise the active-session footprint.

Slack is modeled as a work chat tool that stays synced across devices but usually spends more time in text, notifications, and file previews than in continuous media.

Sobre IdleForest

IdleForest es una extensión de navegador pasiva que planta árboles mientras navegas, juegas o haces streaming. Utiliza tu ancho de banda de internet no utilizado para financiar proyectos de reforestación.

Start Planting Free